GT 520 vs GT 230

#ad
Buy
OEM
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GT 230
0.83
+5.1%

GT 230 outperforms GT 520 by 5% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10971101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.010.01
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG94BGF119
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (14 years old)13 April 2011 (12 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$43.99 $59
Current price$123 (2.8x MSRP)$88 (1.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 230 and GT 520 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4848
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed650 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors505 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate15.606.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance156 gflops155.52 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.2
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 230 0.83
+5.1%
GT 520 0.79

GT 230 outperforms GT 520 by 5% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 230 323
+4.9%
GT 520 308

GT 230 outperforms GT 520 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.83 0.79
Recency 12 October 2009 13 April 2011
Cost $43.99 $59
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB (DDR3)
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 29 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and GeForce GT 520. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
GeForce GT 230
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GeForce GT 520

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 52 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 659 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.