Quadro P3200 vs GeForce GT 520 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.00
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF119GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date13 April 2011 (13 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
Core clock speed810 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors292 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate6.480172.8
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIMXM-B (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.16.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2011 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 75 Watt

GT 520 PCI has 158.6% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520 PCI and Quadro P3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520 PCI is a desktop card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
GeForce GT 520 PCI
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 292 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.