Tesla K20X vs GeForce GT 445M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking872not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.40no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF106GK110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)12 November 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442688
CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed590 MHz732 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate14.16164.0
Floating-point processing power0.3398 TFLOPS3.935 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs24224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s249.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 235 Watt

GT 445M has 571.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 445M and Tesla K20X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 445M is a notebook card while Tesla K20X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
GeForce GT 445M
NVIDIA Tesla K20X
Tesla K20X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 445M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 51 vote

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.