ATI Mobility FireGL 7800 vs GeForce GT 445M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking868not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.15no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF106M7
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)29 September 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442
Core clock speed590 MHz280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data280 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate14.160.56
Floating-point processing power0.3398 TFLOPSno data
ROPs242
TMUs242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 29 September 2001
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

GT 445M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility FireGL 7800, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 445M and Mobility FireGL 7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 445M is a notebook graphics card while Mobility FireGL 7800 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
GeForce GT 445M
ATI Mobility FireGL 7800
Mobility FireGL 7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 445M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.