HD Graphics 5300 vs GeForce GT 440
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 5300 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 844 | 1010 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.07 | 0.02 |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Gen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015) |
GPU code name | GF108 | Broadwell GT2 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 5 September 2014 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | no data |
Current price | $160 (2x MSRP) | $623 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GT 440 has 250% better value for money than HD Graphics 5300.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 24 |
CUDA cores | 96 | no data |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 900 MHz |
Number of transistors | 585 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion/sec | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 440 and HD Graphics 5300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | System Shared |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | no data |
Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | HDMIVGADual Link DVI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported GPU Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 5300 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 5300 by 97% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 5300 by 94% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 8−9
+60%
| 5
−60%
|
Full HD | 10−12
+42.9%
| 7
−42.9%
|
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 1.99 | 1.21 |
Recency | 1 February 2011 | 5 September 2014 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | System Shared |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
The GeForce GT 440 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5300 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 440 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 5300 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.