GeForce GT 440 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with GeForce GT 440, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1147848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79
Current price$476 $160 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 3000 and GT 440 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1296
CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed350 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors995 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate13.8013.0 billion/sec
Floating-point performance20.4 gflops311.04 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 3000 and GeForce GT 440 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPUno data1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.14.2
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
GT 440 1.99
+202%

GeForce GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 3000 254
GT 440 770
+203%

GeForce GT 440 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 203% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−200%
24−27
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and GT 440 compete in popular games:

  • GT 440 is 200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 1.99
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GT 440 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 440 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GeForce GT 440

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2219 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1857 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.