Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs GeForce GT 420M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 420M with Radeon RX 7900 GRE, including specs and performance data.

GT 420M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 23 Watt
1.03

RX 7900 GRE outperforms GT 420M by a whopping 6619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking109624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1018.43
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)27 July 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965120
Core clock speed500 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2245 MHz
Number of transistors585 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000718.4
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs16320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 420M 1.03
RX 7900 GRE 69.21
+6619%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 420M 397
RX 7900 GRE 26708
+6627%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 420M 685
RX 7900 GRE 67134
+9701%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 420M 3051
RX 7900 GRE 122732
+3923%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−6567%
800−850
+6567%
Full HD17
−1135%
210
+1135%
1440p1−2
−13200%
133
+13200%
4K1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6833%
208
+6833%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2740%
140−150
+2740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2875%
110−120
+2875%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6033%
184
+6033%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 230−240
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1831%
250−260
+1831%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−12000%
120−130
+12000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4029%
280−290
+4029%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−375%
150−160
+375%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2740%
140−150
+2740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2875%
110−120
+2875%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5167%
158
+5167%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 230−240
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1831%
250−260
+1831%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−12000%
120−130
+12000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−5657%
403
+5657%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1236%
140−150
+1236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−375%
150−160
+375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2740%
140−150
+2740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2875%
110−120
+2875%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 230−240
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2162%
294
+2162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4943%
353
+4943%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1800%
209
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−375%
150−160
+375%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−12000%
120−130
+12000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16400%
160−170
+16400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8000%
80−85
+8000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9700%
98
+9700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8000%
80−85
+8000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−5675%
231
+5675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 156
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−5875%
230−240
+5875%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2750%
110−120
+2750%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 50−55
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 128
+0%
128
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 252
+0%
252
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125
+0%
125
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 131
+0%
131
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how GT 420M and RX 7900 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 6567% faster in 900p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 1135% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 13200% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 7800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900 GRE is 16400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is ahead in 43 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 69.21
Recency 3 September 2010 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 260 Watt

GT 420M has 1030.4% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has a 6619.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 420M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 420M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GeForce GT 420M
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 121 vote

Rate GeForce GT 420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 743 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.