GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs GT 420M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 420M and GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 420M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 23 Watt
1.00

RTX 2080 Max-Q outperforms GT 420M by a whopping 3431% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1112138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.0531.00
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF108TU104B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)29 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962944
Core clock speed500 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1095 MHz
Number of transistors585 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000201.5
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS6.447 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs16184
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 420M 1.00
RTX 2080 Max-Q 35.31
+3431%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 420M 395
RTX 2080 Max-Q 13894
+3417%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 420M 685
RTX 2080 Max-Q 27973
+3984%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 420M 3051
RTX 2080 Max-Q 51930
+1602%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Full HD18
−550%
117
+550%
1440p2−3
−4000%
82
+4000%
4K1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Fortnite 1−2
−14200%
143
+14200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2388%
199
+2388%
Valorant 30−35
−561%
200−210
+561%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−1054%
270−280
+1054%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Dota 2 14−16
−740%
126
+740%
Fortnite 1−2
−13700%
138
+13700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7300%
74
+7300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
175
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%
Valorant 30−35
−561%
200−210
+561%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Dota 2 14−16
−700%
120
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1600%
136
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
Valorant 30−35
−332%
134
+332%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−12000%
121
+12000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−4520%
230−240
+4520%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2817%
170−180
+2817%
Valorant 1−2
−23900%
240−250
+23900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%
Far Cry 5 0−1 76
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−10000%
101
+10000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−393%
74
+393%
Valorant 5−6
−3960%
200−210
+3960%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 16−18
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100
+0%
100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GT 420M and RTX 2080 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 3233% faster in 900p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 550% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 4000% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 5000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Max-Q is 23900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is ahead in 42 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.00 35.31
Recency 3 September 2010 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 80 Watt

GT 420M has 247.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 3431% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 420M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GeForce GT 420M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 125 votes

Rate GeForce GT 420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 196 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 420M or GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.