GeForce RTX 5090 vs GT 335M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 335M with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

GT 335M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.85

RTX 5090 outperforms GT 335M by a whopping 10162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11292
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.94
Power efficiency2.4112.04
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT215GB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7221760
Core clock speed450 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors727 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate10.801,637
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
Gigaflops233no data
ROPs8176
TMUs24680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 335M 0.85
RTX 5090 87.23
+10162%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 335M 378
RTX 5090 38990
+10215%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−1388%
238
+1388%
1440p1−2
−20000%
201
+20000%
4K1−2
−15600%
157
+15600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.40
1440pno data9.95
4Kno data12.73

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12050%
240−250
+12050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12050%
240−250
+12050%
Fortnite 1−2
−30100%
300−350
+30100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−5633%
300−350
+5633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
Valorant 30−35
−2094%
650−700
+2094%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1109%
270−280
+1109%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12050%
240−250
+12050%
Dota 2 14−16
−9900%
1400−1450
+9900%
Fortnite 1−2
−30100%
300−350
+30100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−5633%
300−350
+5633%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6800%
69
+6800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8580%
400−450
+8580%
Valorant 30−35
−2094%
650−700
+2094%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12050%
240−250
+12050%
Dota 2 14−16
−9900%
1400−1450
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−5633%
300−350
+5633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7060%
358
+7060%
Valorant 30−35
−2094%
650−700
+2094%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−30100%
300−350
+30100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−10220%
500−550
+10220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
Far Cry 5 0−1 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−15200%
300−350
+15200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−32600%
327
+32600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 128
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1147%
180−190
+1147%
Valorant 5−6
−6540%
300−350
+6540%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 75−80
Far Cry 5 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 202
+0%
202
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 167
+0%
167
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 386
+0%
386
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

This is how GT 335M and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 1388% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 20000% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 15600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5090 is 32600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is ahead in 34 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 87.23
Recency 7 January 2010 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 575 Watt

GT 335M has 1953.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 10162.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 335M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 335M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 335M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 335M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2306 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 335M or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.