GeForce MX450 vs GT 335M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
320M 325M 330M 330M Mac Edition 335M 540M 630M 635M 650M 720M 740M 750M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX450 MX450 12W MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps MX450 N18S-G5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 335M and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 335M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.83

MX450 outperforms GT 335M by a whopping 913% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 335M GT 335M
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1173510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.3927.07
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT215N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)1 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72896
Core clock speed450 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors727 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate10.80100.8
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
Gigaflops233no data
ROPs832
TMUs2464
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 335M 0.83
GeForce MX450 8.41
+913%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 335M Samples: 324 369
GeForce MX450 Samples: 1397 3718
+908%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 335M 3106
GeForce MX450 22831
+635%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−75%
28
+75%
1440p1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
4K2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
22
+1000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3300%
34
+3300%
Fortnite 0−1 61
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 34
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Valorant 30−35
−187%
85−90
+187%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−500%
130−140
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Dota 2 14−16
−529%
88
+529%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
Fortnite 0−1 39
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 26
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−450%
33
+450%
Valorant 30−35
−187%
85−90
+187%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8
+300%
Dota 2 14−16
−479%
81
+479%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
Valorant 30−35
−187%
85−90
+187%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 25

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Far Cry 5 0−1 20
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Valorant 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GT 335M and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is 75% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX450 is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX450 is 1150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 3300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 performs better in 37 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (37%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.83 8.41
Recency 7 January 2010 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 913.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 335M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 335M
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 335M GeForce GT 335M
vs
HD 8510G Radeon HD 8510G
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
vs
GTX 680MX GeForce GTX 680MX
GT 335M GeForce GT 335M
vs
HD 7620G Radeon HD 7620G
Playstation 4 Pro GPU Playstation 4 Pro GPU
vs
HD 6720G2 HD 6720G2
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
vs
HD 6650M HD 6650M
RX 6400 RX 6400
vs
HD 6650M HD 6650M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
vs
ATI HD 5570 HD 5570
GeForce MX230 MX230
vs
GTS 250M GTS 250M
GT 740 OEM GT 740 OEM
vs
GT 220 GT 220
8800 GTS 640 8800 GTS 640
vs
GT 220 GT 220
7300 GT 7300 GT
vs
GT 220 GT 220
GeForce 310M 310M
vs
GT 420M GT 420M
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
vs
GT 420M GT 420M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 335M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1408 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 335M or GeForce MX450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.