GeForce 8800 GTS 640 vs GT 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1265not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT216G80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)8 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4896
Core clock speed625 MHz513 MHz
Number of transistors486 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt143 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate10.0024.62
Floating-point processing power0.1306 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs1624
L2 Cache64 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB640 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s63.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 8 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 640 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 143 Watt

GT 220 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 146.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 220 and GeForce 8800 GTS 640. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
GeForce 8800 GTS 640

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 847 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 47 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220 or GeForce 8800 GTS 640, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.