Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB vs GeForce GT 320M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1403not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.48no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG96CGA10B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed500 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00083.20
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 60 Watt

GT 320M has 328.6% lower power consumption.

Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB, on the other hand, has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320M and Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 136 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 13 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.