HD Graphics P4000 vs GeForce GT 320 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.06
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGT215Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 February 2010 (14 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72128
Core clock speed540 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors727 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.9620.00
Floating-point processing power0.1875 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length175 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.0
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 February 2010 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 45 Watt

GT 320 OEM has 4.7% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320 OEM and HD Graphics P4000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GeForce GT 320 OEM
Intel HD Graphics P4000
HD Graphics P4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 59 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 101 vote

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.