AeroBox GPU vs GeForce GT 230 OEM
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
| GPU code name | G92B | Kryptos |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 13 March 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 935 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 985 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.00 | 55.16 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.24 TFLOPS | 1.765 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 12 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 24 GB/s | 68.22 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 April 2009 | 13 March 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
GT 230 OEM has 33.3% lower power consumption.
AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 OEM and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
