GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs GT 220M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 220M and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 220M
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.38

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB outperforms GT 220M by a whopping 2897% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1313443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.0711.58
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG96CGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 February 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed500 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1442 MHz
Number of transistors314 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00069.22
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS2.215 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs1648
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cache32 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s84.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.16.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Valorant 27−30
−2863%
800−850
+2863%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 10−11
−2800%
290−300
+2800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Valorant 27−30
−2863%
800−850
+2863%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 10−11
−2800%
290−300
+2800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Valorant 27−30
−2863%
800−850
+2863%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Valorant 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 11.39
Recency 15 June 2009 1 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 75 Watt

GT 220M has 435.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 2897.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
GeForce GT 220M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 99 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220M or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.