Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GT 220

Place in the ranking	1216	361
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.68	11.85
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GT216	Navi 14
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	12 October 2009 (15 years ago)	7 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	1408
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1375 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1645 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	85 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	9.840	144.8
Floating-point processing power	0.1277 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	168 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.3 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	VGADVIHDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF + HDA	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 220 0.55

RX 5500M 14.08
+2460%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220 219

RX 5500M 5626
+2469%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21 −176%	58 +176%
1440p	2−3 −3050%	63 +3050%
4K	1−2 −2900%	30 +2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.81	no data
1440p	40.00	no data
4K	79.99	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −378%	43 +378%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55 +1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −300%	36 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1583%	101 +1583%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1040%	57 +1040%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −400%	35 +400%
Fortnite	0−1	80−85
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1267%	82 +1267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1000%	88 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −540%	32 +540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
World of Tanks	16−18 −1024%	191 +1024%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −189%	24−27 +189%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1186%	90 +1186%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1100%	72 +1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1225%	100−110 +1225%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −5733%	175 +5733%
World of Tanks	1−2 −13600%	137 +13600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	12−14
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8 +167%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Valorant	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Dota 2	14−16 −33.3%	20 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −33.3%	20 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −7100%	72 +7100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −33.3%	20 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	14−16
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Dota 2	14−16 −253%	53 +253%
Valorant	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	108 +0%	108 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	88 +0%	88 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 +0%	79 +0%
Metro Exodus	16 +0%	16 +0%
Valorant	57 +0%	57 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	103 +0%	103 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	47 +0%	47 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
World of Tanks	76 +0%	76 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Fortnite	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

This is how GT 220 and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

RX 5500M is 176% faster in 1080p
RX 5500M is 3050% faster in 1440p
RX 5500M is 2900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5500M is 13600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5500M is ahead in 34 tests (55%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.55	14.08
Recency	12 October 2009	7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	85 Watt

GT 220 has 46.6% lower power consumption.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has a 2460% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 220 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5500M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.