Radeon HD 5570 vs GeForce 9700M GTS

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

9700M GTS
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.72

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 72% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11231000
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.010.02
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNB9E-GSRedwood
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (15 years ago)9 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$230 $149

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 5570 has 100% better value for money than 9700M GTS.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48400
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed530 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors505 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt39 Watt
Texture fill rate12.7213.00
Floating-point performance127.2 gflops520.0 gflops
Gigaflops180no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce 9700M GTS and Radeon HD 5570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz667 - 900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9700M GTS 0.72
ATI HD 5570 1.24
+72.2%

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 72% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9700M GTS 278
ATI HD 5570 479
+72.3%

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 72% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9700M GTS 2825
ATI HD 5570 3917
+38.7%

Radeon HD 5570 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 39% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Full HD12−14
−83.3%
22
+83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how 9700M GTS and ATI HD 5570 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5570 is 87.5% faster than 9700M GTS in 900p
  • ATI HD 5570 is 83.3% faster than 9700M GTS in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5570 is 100% faster than the 9700M GTS.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5570 is ahead in 11 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (56%)

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.72 1.24
Recency 15 July 2008 9 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 39 Watt

The Radeon HD 5570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GTS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9700M GTS is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GeForce 9700M GTS
ATI Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 5570

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9700M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 250 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.