UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce GT 1030

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 1030 with UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), including specs and performance data.

GT 1030
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.37
+35%

GT 1030 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking576646
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.31no data
Power efficiency14.54no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGP108Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed1228 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.23no data
Floating-point processing power1.127 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMIno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 1030 6.37
+35%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 1030 4728
+49.2%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 1030 20192
+48%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 1030 3625
+45.3%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 1030 22069
+40.4%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 1030 219163
+94%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 112966

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
1440p23
−8.7%
25
+8.7%
4K8
−50%
12
+50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.29no data
1440p3.43no data
4K9.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
+50%
10
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
Battlefield 5 22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+221%
27−30
−221%
Hitman 3 16
+60%
10
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 152
+390%
30−35
−390%
Metro Exodus 26
+18.2%
22
−18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+107%
15
−107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
+118%
16−18
−118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
+97.9%
47
−97.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+190%
27−30
−190%
Hitman 3 15
+66.7%
9
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 123
+297%
30−35
−297%
Metro Exodus 20
+25%
16
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+11.8%
17
−11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+95.3%
43
−95.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
+90%
10
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+50%
8
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−650%
45−50
+650%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+60%
30−33
−60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

This is how GT 1030 and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is 33% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 9% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 1030 is 390% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is ahead in 59 tests (87%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 8 tests (12%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.37 4.72
Recency 17 May 2017 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

GT 1030 has a 35% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 1030 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7838 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.