GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.33

GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking691425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.38
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGP107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)21 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed350 MHz1392 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1518 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data72.86
Floating-point processing powerno data2.332 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−165%
45−50
+165%
1440p30
−167%
80−85
+167%
4K12
−150%
30−35
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 53
−164%
140−150
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−170%
27−30
+170%
God of War 12
−150%
30−33
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−179%
95−100
+179%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry 5 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Fortnite 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Forza Horizon 5 16
−181%
45−50
+181%
God of War 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−181%
45−50
+181%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−173%
210−220
+173%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Dota 2 36
−178%
100−105
+178%
Far Cry 5 13
−169%
35−40
+169%
Fortnite 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
God of War 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−181%
45−50
+181%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Dota 2 33
−173%
90−95
+173%
Far Cry 5 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
God of War 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−163%
21−24
+163%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−169%
70−75
+169%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−179%
95−100
+179%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−179%
95−100
+179%
Valorant 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
God of War 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Valorant 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
God of War 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GTX 1050 3 GB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 3 GB is 165% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 3 GB is 167% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 3 GB is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.33 12.19
Recency 11 May 2021 21 May 2018
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1050 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 181.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 400 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.