NVS 810 vs GeForce GT 1030

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 1030 with NVS 810, including specs and performance data.

GT 1030
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.38
+106%

GT 1030 outperforms NVS 810 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking578767
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.31no data
Power efficiency14.673.15
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP108GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)4 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed1228 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate35.2333.06
Floating-point processing power1.127 TFLOPS1.058 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm198 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI8x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.15.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 1030 6.38
+106%
NVS 810 3.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 1030 2454
+106%
NVS 810 1190

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+140%
10−12
−140%
1440p26
+117%
12−14
−117%
4K9
+125%
4−5
−125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.29no data
1440p3.04no data
4K8.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
Elden Ring 16
+129%
7−8
−129%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Metro Exodus 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+121%
14−16
−121%
Valorant 18
+125%
8−9
−125%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Dota 2 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Elden Ring 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Fortnite 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+107%
14−16
−107%
Metro Exodus 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 63
+110%
30−33
−110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Valorant 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
World of Tanks 100−105
+122%
45−50
−122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Dota 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+129%
7−8
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Valorant 14
+133%
6−7
−133%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Elden Ring 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
World of Tanks 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+140%
5−6
−140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Fortnite 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how GT 1030 and NVS 810 compete in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is 140% faster in 1080p
  • GT 1030 is 117% faster in 1440p
  • GT 1030 is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.38 3.10
Recency 17 May 2017 4 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 68 Watt

GT 1030 has a 105.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 126.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 1030 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030
NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7995 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.