GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GT 1030

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 1030 with GeForce GTX 485M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GT 1030
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.37

GTX 485M SLI outperforms GT 1030 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570470
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.31no data
Power efficiency14.706.39
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP108N11E-GTX-A1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1228 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate35.23no data
Floating-point processing power1.127 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMIno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 1030 6.37
GTX 485M SLI 9.22
+44.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 1030 4728
GTX 485M SLI 5334
+12.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 1030 20192
GTX 485M SLI 24830
+23%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p60−65
−48.3%
89
+48.3%
Full HD24
−308%
98
+308%
1440p17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
4K8
−25%
10−12
+25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.29no data
1440p4.65no data
4K9.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 22
−27.3%
27−30
+27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+52.5%
60−65
−52.5%
Hitman 3 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 152
+198%
50−55
−198%
Metro Exodus 26
−11.5%
27−30
+11.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
+52.5%
60−65
−52.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
−30%
24−27
+30%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+37.7%
60−65
−37.7%
Hitman 3 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 123
+141%
50−55
−141%
Metro Exodus 20
−45%
27−30
+45%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+37.7%
60−65
−37.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−214%
21−24
+214%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5
−280%
18−20
+280%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−281%
60−65
+281%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
−168%
50−55
+168%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−108%
24−27
+108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−917%
60−65
+917%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 19
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−95%
35−40
+95%
Hitman 3 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
−22.9%
55−60
+22.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 4
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hitman 3 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−118%
35−40
+118%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

This is how GT 1030 and GTX 485M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 48% faster in 900p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 308% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 41% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 1030 is 198% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 485M SLI is 917% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is ahead in 12 tests (17%)
  • GTX 485M SLI is ahead in 57 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.37 9.22
Recency 17 May 2017 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 100 Watt

GT 1030 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 485M SLI, on the other hand, has a 44.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7669 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.