Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce G102M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	496
Place by popularity	not in top-100	68
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	C79	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	80
CUDA cores	16	no data
Core clock speed	450 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	no data
Gigaflops	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce G102M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI-E 1.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2	no data
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12_1
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	2.1	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	8 January 2009	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	28 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---