GMA X4500 vs GeForce G102M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code name	C79	Eaglelake
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)	1 June 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	no data	$114

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	80
CUDA cores	16	no data
Core clock speed	450 MHz	533 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	13 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	2.132
Gigaflops	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 1.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	IGP	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	10.0
Shader Model	4.0	4.0
OpenGL	2.1	2.0
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	8 January 2009	1 June 2008
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	13 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---