Radeon Graphics 320SP vs GeForce G 205M
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | MCP79MX | Renoir |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $1279 | $90 |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 28.00 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce G 205M and Radeon Graphics 320SP compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | IGP |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 6 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce G 205M and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce G 205M is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics 320SP is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
