ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV31MR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5no data
Core clock speed1 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data110 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.600 ×4
ROPsno data8 ×4
TMUsno data8 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 MB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed300 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

FX Go 5600 / 5650 has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9700 PRO X4, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650
ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4
Radeon 9700 PRO X4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.