ATI Radeon 9700 vs GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.26
Architectureno dataRage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV31MR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5no data
Core clock speed1 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data110 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data37 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data17.28 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

FX Go 5600 / 5650 has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9700, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 and Radeon 9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 is a notebook card while Radeon 9700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650
ATI Radeon 9700
Radeon 9700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.