Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs GeForce FX 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce FX 5900 with Quadro NVS 280 PCI, including specs and performance data.

FX 5900
2003, $399
128 MB DDR
0.08
+300%

FX 5900 outperforms 280 PCI by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15241554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.12
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV35NV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 May 2003 (22 years ago)28 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors135 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001.100
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI
Length218 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0a
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5900 0.08
+300%
NVS 280 PCI 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5900 34
+325%
Samples: 8
NVS 280 PCI 8
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 0.02
Recency 12 May 2003 28 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

FX 5900 has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The GeForce FX 5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 280 PCI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5900 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 55 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 11 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5900 or Quadro NVS 280 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.