Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs GeForce FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.12
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV30NV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 March 2003 (22 years ago)28 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors125 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001.100
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI
Length213 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0a
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 28 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 13 Watt

FX 5800 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 238.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 and Quadro NVS 280 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 11 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5800 or Quadro NVS 280 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.