RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce FX 5700 EP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.88
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV36GA106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed425 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1358 MHz
Number of transistors82 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate1.700108.6
Floating-point processing powerno data6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 EP and RTX A2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 EP is a desktop card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP
GeForce FX 5700 EP
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX 5700 EP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 92 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.