FirePro W4000 vs GeForce FX 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1492not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNV18 C1Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 March 2003 (21 year ago)7 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed250 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors29 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00039.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data183 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 7 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

FirePro W4000 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5200 and FirePro W4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop card while FirePro W4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
GeForce FX 5200
AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 246 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.