FirePro M3900 vs GeForce 9800M GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1133not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG92Seymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112160
CUDA cores per GPU112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors754 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate28.006.000
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
Gigaflops420no data
ROPs164
TMUs568
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 19 October 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTX and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.