FirePro M3900 vs GeForce 9800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.87no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG94Seymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64160
Core clock speed600 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors505 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate19.206.000
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
Gigaflops240no data
ROPs164
TMUs328
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GTS
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.