ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP vs GeForce 9800M GTX
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1133 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.12 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | G92 | RV570 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 (17 years ago) | 25 October 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $328.50 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | no data |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 330 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 6.900 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.28 TFLOPS | no data |
| Gigaflops | 420 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 12 |
| TMUs | 56 | 12 |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x Molex |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 44.16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 July 2008 | 25 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 66 Watt |
9800M GTX has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 23% more advanced lithography process.
ATI X1950 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 14% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTX and Radeon X1950 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1950 PRO AGP is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
