ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS SLI with Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTS SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.78
+394%

9800M GTS SLI outperforms X1950 CrossFire Edition by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9741340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.91no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTR580+
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)10 September 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million384 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data10.40
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VHDCI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Valorant 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Valorant 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.78 0.36
Recency 15 July 2008 10 September 2006
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm

9800M GTS SLI has a 394% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS SLI or Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.