Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

Place in performance ranking	849	867
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.32	no data
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	NB9E-GT	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2008 (15 years ago)	8 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$149	$90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	880
Core clock speed	600 MHz	400 / 600 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1800 MHz
Shared memory	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	11
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTS SLI 1.99
+4.7%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1.90

GeForce 9800M GTS SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9800M GTS SLI 5663
+4.9%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 5400

GeForce 9800M GTS SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by 5% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

27−30
+3.8%

−3.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	no data
Battlefield 5	1−2	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	no data
Far Cry 5	3−4	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	no data
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	no data
Hitman 3	4−5	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	no data
Battlefield 5	1−2	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	no data
Far Cry 5	3−4	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	no data
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	no data
Hitman 3	4−5	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	no data
Far Cry 5	3−4	no data
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	3−4	no data
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	no data
Hitman 3	7−8	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

no data

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	no data
Far Cry 5	1−2	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3	no data
Metro Exodus	4−5	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

no data

This is how 9800M GTS SLI and HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

9800M GTS SLI is 4% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.99	1.90
Recency	15 July 2008	8 February 2012
Chip lithography	55 nm	40 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.