RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 9800M GS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GS with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.


9800M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 60 Watt
1.23

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 9800M GS by a whopping 2793% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1091158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5854.81
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG94AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 November 2008 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores643072
Core clock speed530 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors505 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate16.96203.0
Floating-point processing power0.1696 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
Gigaflops254no data
ROPs1648
TMUs3296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cache64 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800M GS 1.23
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 35.59
+2793%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GS 488
Samples: 69
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 14848
+2943%
Samples: 1855

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9800M GS 3245
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844
+1066%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Fortnite 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2789%
260−270
+2789%
Valorant 30−35
−2779%
950−1000
+2779%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−2659%
800−850
+2659%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Dota 2 16−18
−2713%
450−500
+2713%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Fortnite 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2789%
260−270
+2789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Valorant 30−35
−2779%
950−1000
+2779%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Dota 2 16−18
−2713%
450−500
+2713%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2789%
260−270
+2789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Valorant 30−35
−2779%
950−1000
+2779%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−2775%
230−240
+2775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2592%
350−400
+2592%
Valorant 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Valorant 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 35.59
Recency 1 November 2008 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 2793% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GS is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 224 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GS or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.