RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 9800M GT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GT with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

9800M GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.91

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 9800M GT by a whopping 3878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1154145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0755.20
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG92AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963072
Core clock speed500 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors754 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00203.0
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs1648
TMUs4896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800M GT 0.91
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 36.20
+3878%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GT 381
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15168
+3881%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9800M GT 4011
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844
+844%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3733%
230−240
+3733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Valorant 30−33
−3733%
1150−1200
+3733%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−3858%
950−1000
+3858%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Dota 2 14−16
−3829%
550−600
+3829%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3733%
230−240
+3733%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−3733%
230−240
+3733%
Valorant 30−33
−3733%
1150−1200
+3733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Dota 2 14−16
−3829%
550−600
+3829%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3733%
230−240
+3733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−3733%
230−240
+3733%
Valorant 30−33
−3733%
1150−1200
+3733%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3567%
550−600
+3567%
Valorant 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 36.20
Recency 29 July 2008 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 3878% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GeForce 9800M GT
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 36 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.