Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce 9800M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GS with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

9800M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 60 Watt
1.23

RTX 6000 outperforms 9800M GS by a whopping 3366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1091102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.22
Power efficiency1.5812.63
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG94TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2008 (17 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores644608
Core clock speed530 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors505 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate16.96509.8
Floating-point processing power0.1696 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
Gigaflops254no data
ROPs1696
TMUs32288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cache64 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800M GS 1.23
RTX 6000 42.63
+3366%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GS 488
Samples: 69
RTX 6000 17826
+3553%
Samples: 270

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Fortnite 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Valorant 30−35
−3233%
1100−1150
+3233%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−3348%
1000−1050
+3348%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Dota 2 16−18
−3338%
550−600
+3338%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Fortnite 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
Valorant 30−35
−3233%
1100−1150
+3233%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Dota 2 16−18
−3338%
550−600
+3338%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3329%
240−250
+3329%
Valorant 30−35
−3233%
1100−1150
+3233%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3362%
450−500
+3362%
Valorant 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3114%
450−500
+3114%
Valorant 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 42.63
Recency 1 November 2008 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 260 Watt

9800M GS has 333% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 3366% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GS is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 148 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GS or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.