STG vs GeForce 9800 GX2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1034not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG92NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 March 2008 (18 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256 (128 per GPU) ×2no data
Core clock speed600 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)197 Watt2 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate38.40 ×20.08
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×21
TMUs64 ×21
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm168 mm
Height2-slotno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3FPM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×21 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth128 (64 per GPU) ×2400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVI1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)1.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2008 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 197 Watt 2 Watt

9800 GX2 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 669% more advanced lithography process.

STG, on the other hand, has 9750% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GX2 and STG. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GX2 or STG, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.