STG vs GeForce 9800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1118not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG92NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 July 2008 (17 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed600 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt2 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.600.08
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs561
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length229 mm168 mm
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3FPM
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)1.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2008 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 2 Watt

9800 GT has an age advantage of 12 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 669% more advanced lithography process.

STG, on the other hand, has 5150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT and STG. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1638 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GT or STG, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.