Radeon HD 6620G vs GeForce 9800 GX2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800 GX2 with Radeon HD 6620G, including specs and performance data.
9800 GX2 outperforms HD 6620G by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1006 | 1175 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.56 | 1.76 |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | G92 | Sumo |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 18 March 2008 (17 years ago) | 7 December 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) ×2 | 400 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 444 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | 1,178 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 197 Watt | 35 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 ×2 | 8.880 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.384 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.3552 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 16 ×2 | 8 |
TMUs | 64 ×2 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Height | 2-slot | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB ×2 | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit ×2 | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 128 (64 per GPU) ×2 | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 21−24
+61.5%
| 13
−61.5%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 28.52 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
God of War | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
God of War | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
God of War | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
God of War | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how 9800 GX2 and HD 6620G compete in popular games:
- 9800 GX2 is 62% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 35 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.46 | 0.81 |
Recency | 18 March 2008 | 7 December 2011 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 197 Watt | 35 Watt |
9800 GX2 has a 80.2% higher aggregate performance score.
HD 6620G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 462.9% lower power consumption.
The GeForce 9800 GX2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6620G in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 9800 GX2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 6620G is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.