Radeon RX 6800M vs GeForce 9800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GTX with Radeon RX 6800M, including specs and performance data.


9800 GTX
2008, $299
512 MB GDDR3, 140 Watt
1.84

6800M outperforms 9800 GTX by a whopping 1620% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking963195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Power efficiency1.0116.81
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG92Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 March 2008 (18 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282560
Core clock speed675 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2390 MHz
Number of transistors754 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt145 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate43.20382.4
Floating-point processing power0.4321 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache64 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMIVia Adapter-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800 GTX 1.84
RX 6800M 31.65
+1620%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800 GTX 769
Samples: 3
RX 6800M 13246
+1622%
Samples: 662

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1683%
107
+1683%
1440p4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
4K2−3
−2050%
43
+2050%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.83no data
1440p74.75no data
4K149.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+0%
123
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+0%
84
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how 9800 GTX and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is 1683% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 1675% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 2050% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 31.65
Recency 28 March 2008 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 145 Watt

9800 GTX has 4% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has a 1620% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 201 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 351 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GTX or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.