Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce 9800 GTX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800 GTX with Radeon Pro W5700X, including specs and performance data.
Pro W5700X outperforms 9800 GTX by a whopping 1872% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 963 | 151 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.08 | 13.80 |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | 13.63 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | G92 | Navi 10 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 (18 years ago) | 11 December 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Pro W5700X has 17150% better value for money than 9800 GTX.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2040 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 10,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 205 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 43.20 | 293.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4321 TFLOPS | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 |
| TMUs | 64 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 305 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | Quad-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | HDTVDual Link DVI | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.84 | 36.29 |
| Recency | 28 March 2008 | 11 December 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 205 Watt |
9800 GTX has 46% lower power consumption.
Pro W5700X, on the other hand, has a 1872% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro W5700X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
