Radeon 535 Mobile vs GeForce 9800 GTX+
Array ( [0] => Array ( [_id] => 3654 [filename] => Radeon-R7-M265DX [title] => AMD Radeon R7 M265DX [manufacturer] => AMD [result] => 1.29 [_number] => 1002 [custom_id] => ) )
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 998 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | no data |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
GPU code name | G92B | Polaris 24 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 384 |
CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1024 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 141 Watt | 50 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 47.23 | 24.58 |
Floating-point performance | 0.47 gflops | 0.7864 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | HDTVDual Link DVI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 16 January 2009 | 18 April 2017 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 141 Watt | 50 Watt |
535 Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 182% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GTX+ and Radeon 535 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop card while Radeon 535 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.