Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs GeForce 9800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1038not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG92Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 July 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1126144
Core clock speed600 MHz2200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3300 MHz
Number of transistors754 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt355 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.601,267
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPS81.1 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs56384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm287 mm
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s960.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 355 Watt

9800 GT has 238.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7950 XTX, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT and Radeon RX 7950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
Radeon RX 7950 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1430 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 185 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.