Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs GeForce 9800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8800 GS 8800 GS Mac Edition 8800 GT 8800 GT Mac Edition 8800 GTS 512 9600 GSO 9600 GTX 9800 GT 9800 GT Rebrand 9800 GTX 9800 GX2 GTS 150 OEM
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GT with Quadro T2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

9800 GT
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 105 Watt
1.24

T2000 Max-Q outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 1344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

9800 GT 9800 GT
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1049318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency0.6830.73
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG92TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 July 2008 (16 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1121024
Core clock speed600 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors754 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt40 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.60103.7
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800 GT 1.24
T2000 Max-Q 17.90
+1344%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800 GT 478
T2000 Max-Q 6898
+1343%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
1440p1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
4K2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p53.33no data
1440p160.00no data
4K80.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how 9800 GT and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is 1800% faster in 1080p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 2500% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 1800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 17.90
Recency 21 July 2008 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 40 Watt

T2000 Max-Q has a 1343.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 441.7% more advanced lithography process, and 162.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
vs
ATI HD 5570 Radeon HD 5570
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
vs
9600 GT GeForce 9600 GT
RTX 4080 SUPER GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
vs
ATI HD 3870 HD 3870
ATI Xbox 360 E GPU Xbox 360 E GPU
vs
ATI HD 2900 GT HD 2900 GT
GeForce4 MX 440 GeForce4 MX 440
vs
ATI 9500 PRO Radeon 9500 PRO
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
vs
GTX 460 GTX 460
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
vs
GTX 285 GTX 285
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
vs
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
R7 M260X Radeon R7 M260X
vs
GTX 280 GTX 280
R7 M260 Radeon R7 M260
vs
GTX 280 GTX 280
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
vs
7300 SE GeForce 7300 SE
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
vs
7500 LE GeForce 7500 LE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 1479 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 75 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GT or Quadro T2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.