Radeon HD 6510G2 vs GeForce 9700M GT

Place in the ranking	1227	1027
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.83	no data
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	G96	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)	14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	400
Core clock speed	625 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	314 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	10.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.0992 TFLOPS	no data
Gigaflops	148	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-II	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Fortnite	0−1	6−7
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
World of Tanks	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
World of Tanks	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Valorant	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%