GeForce 9200M vs Radeon HD 6510G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6510G2 and GeForce 9200M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6510G2
2011
1.21
+256%

HD 6510G2 outperforms 9200M by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10771333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.16
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameno dataC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40016
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
God of War 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
God of War 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Valorant 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
God of War 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
God of War 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Valorant 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
God of War 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.34
Recency 14 June 2011 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

HD 6510G2 has a 255.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6510G2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6510G2
Radeon HD 6510G2
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6510G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6510G2 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.