GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 9700M GT

Place in the ranking	1228	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	84
Power efficiency	0.88	29.66
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G96	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	1024
CUDA cores	32	no data
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	95.04
Floating-point processing power	0.0992 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	148	no data
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9700M GT 0.54

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21
+3643%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9700M GT 208

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+3648%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9700M GT 1750

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+2387%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −5700%	58 +5700%
1440p	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%
4K	0−1	24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1867%

59
+1867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1425%	61 +1425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1667%	53 +1667%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1433%	46 +1433%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −8300%	84 +8300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −920%	51 +920%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1710%	181 +1710%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −570%	201 +570%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1467%	47 +1467%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1100%	36 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
Hitman 3	5−6 −900%	50 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1700%	180 +1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1150%	75 +1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −510%	183 +510%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −575%	27 +575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1033%	34 +1033%
Hitman 3	5−6 −760%	43 +760%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −540%	64 +540%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −950%	63 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−3700%

38
+3700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	21−24
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2500%	26 +2500%
Hitman 3	6−7 −367%	28 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −11900%	120 +11900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1000%

30−35
+1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−800%

18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +0%	49 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	69 +0%	69 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +0%	32 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	79 +0%	79 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +0%	39 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +0%	15 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 +0%	20 +0%
Hitman 3	16 +0%	16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 +0%	42 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +0%	25 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how 9700M GT and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 5700% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 4200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9700M GT is 36% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 11900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

9700M GT is ahead in 1 test (1%)
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 34 tests (49%)
there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	20.21
Recency	29 July 2008	23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	50 Watt

9700M GT has 11.1% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3642.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.