GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 9700M GT

Place in the ranking	1227	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Power efficiency	0.83	27.92
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G96	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	1024
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	95.04
Floating-point processing power	0.0992 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	148	no data
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9700M GT 0.54

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+3656%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9700M GT 208

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+3648%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9700M GT 1750

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+2387%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
1440p	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%
4K	0−1	25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −425%	42 +425%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2850%	59 +2850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −350%	36 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1483%	95 +1483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −780%	44 +780%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −275%	30 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −900%	70 +900%
Fortnite	0−1	100−110
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1150%	75 +1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1600%	130−140 +1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −480%	29 +480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1180%	60−65 +1180%
World of Tanks	16−18 −1356%	230−240 +1356%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −350%	35−40 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1350%	29 +1350%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −857%	65−70 +857%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −950%	63 +950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1600%	130−140 +1600%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −5633%	170−180 +5633%
World of Tanks	1−2 −13600%	130−140 +13600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Valorant	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −6000%	60−65 +6000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	22
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Dota 2	14−16 −247%	52 +247%
Valorant	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Metro Exodus	66 +0%	66 +0%
Valorant	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Elden Ring	73 +0%	73 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +0%	76 +0%
Metro Exodus	45 +0%	45 +0%
Valorant	48 +0%	48 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +0%	52 +0%
Dota 2	112 +0%	112 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +0%	17 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

This is how 9700M GT and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 5800% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 4200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 13600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (54%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	20.28
Recency	29 July 2008	23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	50 Watt

9700M GT has 11.1% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3655.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.