GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs 9600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600M GT and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9600M GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.38

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms 9600M by a whopping 15316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.2941.43
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG96CAD104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores327424
Core clock speed120 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors314 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000386.3
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cache32 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9600M GT 0.38
RTX 4080 Mobile 58.58
+15316%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600M GT 163
Samples: 980
RTX 4080 Mobile 24815
+15124%
Samples: 3149

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9600M GT 1459
RTX 4080 Mobile 111294
+7528%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1150
1440p0−199
4K-0−167

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14800%
149
+14800%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14200%
143
+14200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5725%
230−240
+5725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2386%
170−180
+2386%
Valorant 24−27
−1173%
300−350
+1173%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1753%
270−280
+1753%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12300%
124
+12300%
Dota 2 10−11
−1680%
178
+1680%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5725%
230−240
+5725%
Metro Exodus 0−1 146
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2386%
170−180
+2386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6580%
334
+6580%
Valorant 24−27
−1173%
300−350
+1173%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12000%
121
+12000%
Dota 2 10−11
−1550%
165
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5725%
230−240
+5725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2386%
170−180
+2386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3340%
172
+3340%
Valorant 24−27
−1173%
300−350
+1173%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4867%
149
+4867%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−45400%
450−500
+45400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4275%
170−180
+4275%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−19600%
190−200
+19600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−13900%
140
+13900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−929%
144
+929%
Valorant 2−3
−16700%
336
+16700%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+0%
215
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 171
+0%
171
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 196
+0%
196
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 157
+0%
157
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 122
+0%
122
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 157
+0%
157
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 45400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile performs better in 28 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 58.58
Recency 4 June 2008 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 110 Watt

9600M GT has 378.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 15315.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600M GT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 106 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 885 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600M GT or GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.